Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Help with identifying the species your ants

Moderator: ooper01

Zebesian

Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Post: # 30561Post Zebesian
Wed Aug 30, 2017 2:14 pm

Found two of these big black queens over the last couple days. One with wings, one without. Definitely the biggest queens I've caught this season and boy can they scurry quick! Are they carpenter ant queens? Fully or semi claustral?

http://i.imgur.com/Vmly2Sq.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/HltLB8t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/lQ0xIom.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/n7Ni2Mj.jpg

TippyDisc911
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 10:23 am
Location: Oak Forest, Illinois, Usa

Re: Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Post: # 30572Post TippyDisc911
Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:49 pm

I would say camponotus pennsylvanicus
Keeping:
Formica subsericea: 10 workers
Tetramourium Immigrans: 12 workers
solenopsis molesta: 25-30 workers

"The ant's a centaur in his dragon world"-Ezra Pound

Dream species: Atta Texana

User avatar
Phoenix
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:17 pm
Location: Malaysia

Re: ID Request

Post: # 30585Post Phoenix
Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:32 pm

Either Formica / Camponotus.
'Have Fun.' - Gabe Newell

Perkdawg
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 9:18 pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Post: # 30599Post Perkdawg
Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:56 pm

Certainly Formica, more specifically of the Formica fusca species group. For the species, they are likely Formica fusca, but could also be another very similar species of the same group such as Formica podzolica or Formica argentea for example. Formica ants of the Formica fusca species group are fully claustral, so you probably won't need to feed them until the first workers arrive. Be warned though, Formica ants do not keep brood over the winter so they will probably not lay eggs until you take them out of hibernation around late February or March of next year. Kinda stinks I know but Formica ants are very lively and active ants and are great to keep. PM me if you have any questions. Good luck! :)

KSkuroooari

Re: Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Post: # 30602Post KSkuroooari
Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:57 pm

Perkdawg wrote:
Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:56 pm
Certainly Formica, more specifically of the Formica fusca species group.
Just because I have such a hard time distinguishing between the two, would you be able to tell me what makes it so 'certainly Formica' compared to a Camponotus?

Here is my C. modoc in comparison:

Image

I don't see that tell-tale single curve versus distinct dual curve that was mentioned as an identifying trait on another website.

Thanks.

User avatar
Batspiderfish
Posts: 3315
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:47 pm
Location: Maine

Re: Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Post: # 30603Post Batspiderfish
Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:49 pm

The curvature of the mesosoma only applies to workers. Another way you can tell the difference: the antennal sockets on Formica touch the edge of clypeus, whereas the sockets on Camponotus are higher up on the carina and not directly adjacent to the clypeus.
If you enjoy my expertise and identifications, please do not put wild populations at risk of disease by releasing pet colonies. We are responsible to give our pets the best care we can manage for the rest of their lives.

Zebesian

Re: Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Post: # 30631Post Zebesian
Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:59 am

Would grabbing a measurement when I get home help put an end to the debate? I assumed it was camponotus because it was so much bigger than the rest of my ants (so far I also have tetramorium, lasius and possibly pheidole?) but if Formica are also bigger than all of those then I'm not so sure anymore at all.

User avatar
Batspiderfish
Posts: 3315
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:47 pm
Location: Maine

Re: Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Post: # 30637Post Batspiderfish
Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:37 pm

You're supposed to have a measurement anyways, but I can tell from the pictures that she is a Formica sp. Formica are larger than the ants you mentioned, but smaller than most Camponotus (not all).
If you enjoy my expertise and identifications, please do not put wild populations at risk of disease by releasing pet colonies. We are responsible to give our pets the best care we can manage for the rest of their lives.

KSkuroooari

Re: Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Post: # 30655Post KSkuroooari
Fri Sep 01, 2017 12:59 am

Batspiderfish wrote:
Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:49 pm
The curvature of the mesosoma only applies to workers. Another way you can tell the difference: the antennal sockets on Formica touch the edge of clypeus, whereas the sockets on Camponotus are higher up on the carina and not directly adjacent to the clypeus.
Haha. Thank you. I had to Google most of the terms but at least I learned something. 😂 And after looking at more photos of the two (and actually knowing what to look for), I can see the difference now. Hopefully, I can now at least distinguish between the two.

By the way, do you know if the white hairs of the C. laevigatus is a for-sure identifying trait? Our queen that was identified as C. laevigatus because she was shinier than the other two, is golden, not white. Does this mean she's not a C. laevigatus?

Zebesian

Re: Queen ID, Found in Seattle WA

Post: # 30971Post Zebesian
Tue Sep 05, 2017 11:51 am

So I read above that Formica aren't supposed to lay eggs until after the winter? Well so far one of them has layed a couple. Is that egg laying rule a 100% thing or just what generally happens?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests