Northern Ontario (Thunder Bay) Queens caught Aug 29
Moderator: ooper01
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:50 am
- Location: Northern Ontario
Northern Ontario (Thunder Bay) Queens caught Aug 29
Hello,
I had an amazing ant day while walking through the residential area of the city of Thunder Bay.
I caught 6 queens!
They all seem to be the same species but I can't put my finger on what they are.
I'm pretty sure they are some sort of Formica queen.
They are all roughly 10mm in length.
Caught in Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Caught on August 29th, 2017.
Here is a picture of two of the queens.
I had an amazing ant day while walking through the residential area of the city of Thunder Bay.
I caught 6 queens!
They all seem to be the same species but I can't put my finger on what they are.
I'm pretty sure they are some sort of Formica queen.
They are all roughly 10mm in length.
Caught in Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Caught on August 29th, 2017.
Here is a picture of two of the queens.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 11:04 am
Re: Northern Ontario (Thunder Bay) Queens caught Aug 29
It looks like there is to much water going through the cotton in your test tube try adding more cotton
Keeper of
Camponotus
As Mike would say it's Ant Love Forever
Camponotus
As Mike would say it's Ant Love Forever
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:50 am
- Location: Northern Ontario
Re: Northern Ontario (Thunder Bay) Queens caught Aug 29
Yep, they are most definitely of the Formica genus, more specifically the Formica fusca species group. Species in this group are very difficult to distinguish, and only small differences separate the species. From what I see though, they most likely are Formica fusca, but there's still a possibility they could be Formica subsericea or Formica podzolica. Maybe someone else can get a more precise ID.
Re: Northern Ontario (Thunder Bay) Queens caught Aug 29
Wait I think I was wrong. (Sorry!) After looking over the photos again I'm 99% sure she's Camponotus. Probably Camponotus pennsylvanicus or maybe Camponotus modoc (although Thunder Bay is near the edge of modoc's range) The head size and shape indicates Camponotus. Formica would have a much smaller head.Perkdawg wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:39 pmYep, they are most definitely of the Formica genus, more specifically the Formica fusca species group. Species in this group are very difficult to distinguish, and only small differences separate the species. From what I see though, they most likely are Formica fusca, but there's still a possibility they could be Formica subsericea or Formica podzolica. Maybe someone else can get a more precise ID.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:50 am
- Location: Northern Ontario
Re: Northern Ontario (Thunder Bay) Queens caught Aug 29
Seriously? She just doesn't seem big enough for camponotus Pennsylvanicus, because I've seen workers bigger than her.
She is 1cm in length.
Also the camponotus americanus queens I witnessed earlier in the year were half a centimeter bigger.
I was really hoping for Formica aswell. Darn.
Because my old Formica Podzolica queen sadly didn't work out.
She is 1cm in length.
Also the camponotus americanus queens I witnessed earlier in the year were half a centimeter bigger.
I was really hoping for Formica aswell. Darn.
Because my old Formica Podzolica queen sadly didn't work out.
- Batspiderfish
- Posts: 3315
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:47 pm
- Location: Maine
Re: Northern Ontario (Thunder Bay) Queens caught Aug 29
This is Formica sp.
If you enjoy my expertise and identifications, please do not put wild populations at risk of disease by releasing pet colonies. We are responsible to give our pets the best care we can manage for the rest of their lives.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:50 am
- Location: Northern Ontario
Re: Northern Ontario (Thunder Bay) Queens caught Aug 29
Okay!
Sorry @perkdawg, but I'm going to trust the majority in this one.
Re: Northern Ontario (Thunder Bay) Queens caught Aug 29
Haha maybe I should have trusted my first impulse. Sorry for the confusion. Batspiderfish is definitely the more trustable source for this info anyway. Good luck!ameablable wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2017 8:13 amOkay!
Sorry @perkdawg, but I'm going to trust the majority in this one.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests